Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 10 Next »

Original Publication
HEAL Toronto


Walter W. Stewart and Ned Feder saved the "Dingell Staff Report" from the memory hole. Walter Stewart's website archives of scientific misconduct disappeared off the internet in mid-1999 and have not resurfaced. Here you will find the monumental document along with many others related to the Gallo Case.

INVESTIGATION OF THE INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSE TO THE HIV BLOOD TEST PATENT DISPUTE AND RELATED MATTERS

Staff Report Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Committee on Energy and Commerce U.S. House of Representatives

Commentary

  • Commentary - The Gallo Case
    from Challenges by Serge Lang
    This 240-page article reviews the investigations of Robert Gallo's alleged misconduct highlighting many of the most significant revelations from the various reports.

Related Documents

Articles in the Press

  • Articles in the Press - Feder, Stewart Rapped for Letter on NIH Stationery
    Science & Government Report 1 March 1995
    In a sparkling display of asininity, the National Institutes of Health has issued an "Official Reprimand" to its long-troublesome duo, Ned Feder and Walter Stewart, accusing them of violating a 1993 order to refrain from pursuing scientific misconduct. Their offense: writing a letter on NIH stationery.

  • Articles in the Press - With New Virology Institute, Gallo May Make A Fresh Start In Baltimore
    The Scientist, Vol:9, #15, pg.3 , July 24, 1995
    With a powerful group of local backers to ease the transition, controversial virologist Robert Gallo hopes for a fresh start, both personally and scientifically, when his Institute of Human Virology opens its doors this fall. The new institute, intended to advance the fight against AIDS and other diseases, will be affiliated with the University of Maryland at Baltimore. And it appears that his fellow scientists -- with a few sharp exceptions -- are ready to let accusations of scientific misconduct that have marked the last decade of his 30-year career at the National Institutes of Health fade. Indeed, many support him and wish him success in his endeavor.

  • No labels