Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Page Properties
idtag

Author

  • Peter Duesberg

Publisher

  • Bio/Technology

...

Category

  • Controversy

Topic

  • AIDS Paradox

  • AIDS Dilemma

Article Type

  • Column

Publish Year

  • 1987

...

Content Type

...

  • Editorial article

...

Page Properties
idmeta

Meta Description

  • The article challenges the belief that HIV causes AIDS, arguing HIV isn't a pathogen and lacks direct evidence in AIDS patients. It questions the small percentage of HIV to AIDS cases and the latency period.

Summary

  • This is an article challenging the widely accepted theory that the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is the cause of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). The author argues that HIV does not meet the criteria to be considered a pathogen and that there is no direct evidence of the virus in people with AIDS. The article also questions why only a small percentage of people with HIV develop AIDS and why there is a latency period of several years before the onset of the disease. The author suggests that there may be other factors at play and that the virus-AIDS hypothesis fails to make a case for sufficiency.

Meta Tag

  • AIDS

  • HIV

  • Virus

  • Antibody

  • Cells

  • Disease

  • Infection

  • Pathogen

  • Immunity

  • Latency

Featured Image

Featured Image Alt Tag

  • Keyword of the image

By Peter Duesberg
Bio/Technology Nov. 1987

...

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) has become a cause celebre for journals, companies, and scientists, and the "deadly AIDS virus" has been sold to the public as the cause of AIDS with the confidence and authority that is usually derived from absolute scientific proof. The bases of the virus-AIDS hypothesis are that this retrovirus was originally isolated from an immune-deficient patient, that 80%-90% of AIDS patients have antibody to the virus, and that there is a reasonable correlation between anti-viral antibodies and persons in high-risk groups for the disease. The hypothesis is appealing because it appears to fit a 100-year-old tradition of triumphs in medicine that proved viral and bacterial parasites to be the causes of contagious disease. But this appearance is deceptive.

...