Page Comparison

1. Leonore A. Herzenberg*,

2. Stephen C. De Rosa*†,

3. J. Gregson Dubs*,

4. Mario Roederer*,

5. Michael T. Anderson*,

6. Stephen W. Ela*,

7. Stanley C. Deresinski‡, and

8. Leonard A. Herzenberg*

By Leonore A. Herzenberg, Stephen C. De Rosa, J. Gregson Dubs, Mario Roederer, Michael T. Anderson, Stephen W. Ela, Stanley C. Deresinski, and Leonard A. Herzenberg.
March 4, 1997 ∙ 94 (5) 1967-1972 ∙ https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.5.196

Original Publication
PNAS ∙ https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.94.5.19671967#aff-1

...

Abstract

Glutathione (GSH), a cysteine-containing tripeptide, is essential for the viability and function of virtually all cells. In vitro studies showing that low GSH levels both promote HIV expression and impair T cell function suggested a link between GSH depletion and HIV disease progression. Clinical studies presented here directly demonstrate that low GSH levels predict poor survival in otherwise indistinguishable HIV-infected subjects. Specifically, we show that GSH deficiency in CD4 T cells from such subjects is associated with markedly decreased survival 2–3 years after baseline data collection (Kaplan–Meier and logistic regression analyses, P < 0.0001 for both analyses). This finding, supported by evidence demonstrating that oral administration of the GSH prodrug N-acetylcysteine replenishes GSH in these subjects and suggesting that N-acetylcysteine administration can improve their survival, establishes GSH deficiency as a key determinant of survival in HIV disease. Further, it argues strongly that the unnecessary or excessive use of acetaminophen, alcohol, or other drugs known to deplete GSH should be avoided by HIV-infected individuals.

...

Clinical studies presented here directly link GSH deficiency to impaired survival in HIV disease. We show that (i) the probability that HIV-infected subjects will die within 2–3 years is dramatically higher at low baseline CD4 T cell GSH levels; (ii) oral administration of N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a cysteine prodrug used to replenish GSH after acetaminophen overdose (7), increases GSH levels in HIV-infected subjects; and (iii) this GSH replenishment may be associated with prolongation of survival. Because excessive alcohol consumption (20), UV exposure (21–23), and prolonged or intensive use of medications that deplete GSH—e.g., acetaminophen overdose (7)—can contribute to the GSH depletion in HIV disease, we discuss our findings in terms of changes in medical practice that could slow the development of GSH deficiency and improve survival in HIV disease.§

METHODS

Study Population.

Data presented here are derived from FACS and clinical laboratory assays of blood samples from a cohort of HIV-infected subjects who were screened for enrollment into a clinical trial designed to determine whether orally administered NAC replenishes GSH in subjects with low GSH levels (J.G.D., S.C.D., M.T.A., and L.A.H., unpublished data). None of the screened subjects had CD4 T cell counts above 500/μl blood; none had active opportunistic infections or malignancies; none consumed excessive amounts of products likely to alter GSH levels (e.g., alcohol, vitamin C, vitamin E); none were taking NAC or acetaminophen; and all were readily mobile. Trial enrollment required the following: GSH deficiency indicated by having FACS-measured GSB levels in PBMC CD8 T cells that rank at least one standard deviation below the median for uninfected subjects; no evidence of significant hepatic, renal, or hematologic disease; Karnofsky score >60; and stable (or no) antiretroviral therapy for the previous 4 months (protease inhibitors had not been introduced when these data were collected).

...

Uninfected control subjects were similar in age to the HIV-infected group. About half were laboratory personnel; the remainder lived in the vicinity of the HIV-infected subjects. The percentage of female subjects was higher (≈30%) in the control group.

NAC Administration.

All subjects who took NAC in studies reported here were randomized to receive either NAC or placebo during the double-blind phase of a clinical trial testing oral NAC for GSH replenishment in HIV-infected subjects. All subjects completing this initial 8-week phase of the trial were offered open-label NAC for an additional 6 months. Blinding was maintained until all subjects completed the open-label phase. Drop-out rates and reasons for dropping out of the trial were similar in both arms. Subjects took 3,200–8,000 mg of NAC per day (median, 4,400) for up to 8 months (median, 24 weeks), supplied as 800 mg effervescent tablets by Elan Pharmaceutical (Gainsville, GA).

Assays for GSH.

Total GSH in whole blood was measured in freshly collected blood samples that were mixed within 2 min with 1 ml of 10% sulfosalicylic acid, frozen on dry ice, and stored at −70°C. After thawing, the GSH in the sample was conjugated to monobromobimane and the fluorescent conjugate quantitated by HPLC (24) (modified by M.T.A., unpublished data). Data are expressed as mM GSH by comparison with a GSH standard run with each set of samples.

...

This GSB FACS assay [refs. 12 and 25, as modified by Anderson et al. (26)] is highly reliable. The interassay coefficient of variation of GSB fluorescences, normalized to the reference aliquot, is <7% for all lymphocyte subsets from a single uninfected individual tested 13 times in 14 months. Similarly, in HIV-infected subjects (≈50), GSB levels measured roughly 1 year after baseline routinely decreased about 10% but otherwise showed little variation. Some of the cell-associated fluorescence measured with this assay may reflect formation of bimane conjugates other than GSB (27); however, the assay’s reliability and the correlation of the GSB values it generates with HPLC-measured GSH in blood (see Fig. 1) validate it as an index of intracellular GSH in PBMC subsets..

Figure 1

Figure 1
Image Added
FACS measurement of CD4 T cell GSB fluorescence reflects intracellular GSH levels. GSB is the intracellular fluorescent conjugate of GSH and monochlorobimane. (Top Right) Sample FACS histogram of the GSB fluorescence distribution for CD4 T cells (i.e., GSB in CD4+CD3+ cells) from a single subject. Median (50th percentile) GSB fluorescence levels were computed as shown for each subset in each subject and normalized to the median GSB level for lymphocytes in a PBMC standard analyzed with the samples. Normalized baseline values for the various subsets, labeled as GSB, are shown. (Top Left) This panel relates the median CD4 T cell GSB fluorescence levels to whole blood GSH levels (determined by HPLC) for 53 NAC trial subjects (▪) and 17 male uninfected controls (+). Three HIV-infected outliers (×) were excluded from the analysis (r = 0.56, P < 0.0001 with the outliers included). (Bottom) These panels relate the GSB levels in PBMC subsets from 209 HIV-infected and 82 uninfected subjects. Density ellipses (ovals) include 95% of the points; Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and significance values are computed from a bivariate normal distribution fit (26).

...

...

Statistical Analyses.

Macintosh jmp software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all statistical analyses (28). Survival curves were compared using the generalized Wilcoxon and Log Rank tests. Wilcoxon P values are shown; Log-Rank P values were always smaller (except where noted). Actuarial tests with covariates were based on Cox Log Rank (proportional hazard) procedures. Logistic regression analyses were based on the survival status of subjects 2–3 years after baseline. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to define optimal values for discriminating survivors from nonsurvivors in Kaplan–Meier analyses.

RESULTS

FACS GSB Assay Reveals Intracellular GSH.

The multiparameter FACS method used here simultaneously measures the expression of cell surface markers that identify PBMC subsets and, within the cells in the subsets, the level of GSB, the fluorescent conjugate of monochlorobimane and intracellular GSH. Fig. 1 Top Right contains a typical FACS histogram showing the GSB distribution in CD4 T cells from a single individual. The median values for similar GSB distributions, computed individually for each subset in each PBMC sample, are shown in the remaining panels in Fig. 1 and throughout this study.

The correlation between HPLC-measured GSH in whole blood and the FACS-measured GSB in CD4 T cells (r = 0.64, P < 0.0001) justifies this use of GSB fluorescence as a FACS (cell-by-cell) measure of intracellular GSH. This correlation, which is equivalent to the correlation between GSB levels in B cells and CD4 T cells, is actually better than the correlation between GSB levels in CD4 T cells and monocytes (Fig. 1).

GSB Levels Predict Survival.

The hierarchy of baseline CD4 T cell GSB levels (GSB; note that since we report GSB levels in CD4 T cells from this point forward, we use the term GSB exclusively to refer to these levels) for the subject groups in our study is consistent with earlier findings (8–13) (Table 1 and Fig. 2). On average, uninfected subjects have the highest GSB levels; subjects with CD4 T cell counts ≥200/μl have intermediate GSB levels; subjects with CD4 T cell counts <200/μl have lower GSB levels; and, since the NAC trial protocol specified enrollment of GSH-deficient subjects, the subset of our subjects enrolled in the trial have the lowest GSB levels.

...

^*

Number of subjects for whom survival status was recorded. Overall HIV-infected study group composition: total, 204; male, 198; Caucasian, 155; mean age, 40.4 ± 7.8, range, 23–68. 

...

No trial subjects (NoTS) cohort = all subjects with CD4 T cell counts <200/μl who were not enrolled into the NAC trial but who met the screening criteria (see Methods). Most subjects (39) were not eligible for trial entry because their CD8 GSB levels were too high; the remainder either declined to enter (5 subjects), were judged noncompliant (5 subjects), had a clinical lab value outside the admissible range (7 subjects), or had another protocol-defined exclusion (4 subjects). OPEN IN VIEWER

Figure 2
Image Added
CD4 T cell GSB is lost progressively in HIV disease. Distribution of median baseline GSB levels in CD4 T cells. The vertical bar placed at 1.05 on the GSB axis locates the optimal value (computed by ROC analysis) for discriminating survivors from nonsurvivors among subjects with CD4 counts below 200/μl. Numbers of subjects and statistical data for groups shown are reported in Table 1. See Methods for GSB units; see legend to Table 1 for definition of the NoTS cohort.

...

We ascertained the survival, 2–3 years later, for all subjects for whom we had baseline FACS data. Because only three subjects with CD4 T cell counts above 200/μl died during this period, we present survival data for all screened subjects and for subjects with CD4 T cell counts below 200/μl (CD4 < 200). Furthermore, because survival patterns for subjects who took NAC were significantly different from the overall cohort (see below), we show data for a cohort of subjects with CD4 < 200 who were not enrolled in the NAC trial—i.e., the NoTS cohort as described in the legend for Table 1.

Kaplan–Meier and logistic regression survival analyses (Figs. 3 and 4) reveal the close relationship between GSB levels and survival. Logistic regression analyses (Fig. 3) show that survival improves as baseline GSB increases. These analyses, which estimate survival at the end of the observation period (2–3 years) as a continuous function of GSB level, show the sharp decrease in the percentage of surviving subjects that occurs at baseline GSB levels that are substantially below normal. Data for the NoTS cohort are particularly dramatic, since subjects in the NAC trial (who are excluded from the cohort) had very low GSB levels but tended to survive longer (see below).

Figure 3
Image Added
Survival increases with increasing GSB levels. Logistic regressions in the figure estimate the probability that an individual with a given baseline GSB level (in CD4 T cells) will survive for the entire observation period (2–3 years). None of the subjects showed evidence of debilitating illness at baseline. The regression for the NoTS cohort predicts 65 ± 15% survival for subjects at the mean GSB level for the cohort (0.98); 50% survival for subjects with GSB levels of 0.85 (0.57–1.0, 95% confidence interval); and <40% survival for subjects with GSB levels below 0.72, the mean for subjects in the NAC trial. Histograms show the GSB distributions for survivors (lower histograms) and for nonsurvivors (upper histograms).

...

Figure 4
Image Added
Low GSB levels predict poor survival. Kaplan–Meier analyses of survival. Subjects are subdivided according to baseline GSB levels (in CD4 T cells); thresholds were determined by ROC analysis. Additional Kaplan–Meier survival analyses (not shown) confirm the previously demonstrated poor prognosis of HIV-infected individuals with low CD4 T cell counts (43 subjects) and hematocrit levels (44 subjects) (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively, at the optimal threshold computed by ROC for the group with CD4 < 200).

...

OPEN IN VIEWERThe histograms shown associated with the logistic regressions in Fig. 3 emphasize the difference in GSB levels between survivors (grey bars) and nonsurvivors (filled bars). A simple comparison of the top and bottom quartiles of the overall GSB distributions shows the relationship between GSB and survival: survivors are a distinct minority in the bottom quartiles and an overwhelming majority in the top quartiles (e.g., see Fig. 3).

...

Proportional hazard analyses in which GSB levels and CD4 T cell counts are included in the model also demonstrate that GSB levels significantly predict survival (Table 2). Although GSB correlates loosely but significantly with CD4 T cell counts (Pearson’s r = 0.33, P < 0.0001), the combined entry of the two parameters in the model confirms the predictive value of GSB independent of its correlation with CD4 T cell count. Thus, by all measures, GSB (in CD4 T cells) emerges as a powerful yardstick for predicting survival in HIV infection. (A comparison with viral load would be very useful; however, viral load data are not available for many of the subjects in this study since most blood samples were collected before methodology for measuring viral load was established.)

...

^*

Proportional hazard analysis of risk ratio (continuous variables) = increase in probability of surviving per 0.3 GSB unit (GSB standard deviation) or per 20 CD4 T cells/μl blood; 95% confidence limits shown in parentheses. 

...

Effect likelihood calculated for the indicated variables, adjusted for others in the model if it contains more than one variable. 

OPEN IN VIEWER

GSH Replenishment Is Associated with Increased Survival.

Survival data for subjects who took NAC provide additional evidence supporting the finding that low GSB levels impair survival. Oral administration of NAC was recently shown to increase plasma cysteine levels in HIV-infected subjects with CD4 T cell counts above 200/μl blood (29). This 4-month study was too short to evaluate survival; however, NAC administration was shown to be associated with a significantly decreased rate of CD4 T cell loss during the trial period.

In our trial, which gave similar results, we measured restoration of whole blood GSH rather than plasma cysteine levels. We found that oral administration of NAC during the 8-week initial (randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled) phase of the trial largely restored the whole blood GSH levels (Fig. 5; and J.G.D., S.C.D., M.T.A., and L.A.H., unpublished data). After completing this phase of the trial, the majority of subjects in both arms took NAC during a 6-month open-label phase of the trial. We evaluated the survival of these subjects 2 years after initiation of NAC.

Figure 5
Image Added
Oral administration of NAC increases whole blood GSH. Whole blood GSH was measured by HPLC. HIV-infected subjects were treated for 8 weeks with orally administered NAC (n = 27) or placebo (n = 26) in a randomized double-blind trial. One very high “outlier” was excluded from the placebo group (P value for comparison at 8 weeks when not excluded = 0.02). Subjects took 3,200–8,000 mg of NAC per day for 8 weeks (median, 4,400 mg). Significance was determined by the Anova t test. The bar in the “means diamond” shows the mean and the vertices show the 95% confidence interval for each group (26). Data for 17 uninfected male controls are shown. A complete report of the trial will be presented elsewhere.

...

Surprisingly, subjects with CD4 < 200 who took NAC for 8–32 weeks in our study survived significantly longer than a comparable group (also CD4 < 200) who were not offered or did not choose to take NAC (P = 0.002). In essence, the Kaplan–Meier survival curve for the subjects who took NAC is displaced toward higher survival for about the same length of time as the subjects took NAC (Fig. 6). Furthermore, proportional hazard analysis indicates that subjects who took NAC were roughly twice as likely to survive for 2 years as the subjects who did not take NAC (NAC/No-NAC risk ratio = 1.8, 95% confidence interval = 1.1–3.0; P = 0.019).

Figure 6
Image Added
Oral administration of NAC is associated with increased survival in AIDS. Data are shown only for subjects with CD4 T cell counts below 200/μl followed for up to 2 years. Subjects took NAC (median, 4,400 mg/day) for 8–32 weeks (median, 24 weeks; interquartile range, 12–27 weeks). Survival times for subjects who took NAC are computed from initiation of NAC administration (0 week for NAC arm; 8 weeks after the trial began for placebo arm). Survival times for subjects who did not take NAC are computed from the trial entry or screening date. All subjects who took NAC were enrolled in the NAC replenishment trial: 13 were randomized to the NAC arm; 12 were randomized to the placebo arm and elected to take open-label NAC during the trial continuation phase. Subjects in the No-NAC group were either enrolled in the NAC trial or met the basic criteria for trial entry (3 completed the placebo arm and declined open-label NAC; 9 left the trial, mainly within a week, citing symptoms such as nausea and rash, which were similar to symptoms reported by subjects who completed the trial; 5 declined to enter the trial for personal reasons; and 2 were disqualified for trial entry only because they had recently changed their reverse transcriptase inhibitor regimen). No significant differences (P > 0.1) at baseline were detected between the NAC and No-NAC groups for the following measurements: absolute counts and GSB levels for CD4 and CD8 naive, memory, and overall T cell subsets, and for B cells, monocytes, and NK cells; hematocrit and other clinical laboratory tests; Karnofsky score; age, weight, and previous opportunistic infections. Of over 60 measurements tested, only plasma thioredoxin levels showed a significant difference between the NAC and No-NAC groups (the NAC group was lower, P = 0.01).

...

OPEN IN VIEWER

Proportional hazard analyses examining self-selection, compliance, and other issues that could compromise these findings indicate that survival was not affected by the reasons subjects took NAC (randomized to NAC or elected open-label) or by the reasons they did not take NAC (not enrolled in the trial, refused open-label NAC, left the trial). Further, it was not affected by differences in other potentially relevant parameters—e.g., age, weight, Karnofsky score, reverse transcriptase inhibitor usage (P > 0.2 in all cases; see legend for Fig. 6).

The association of oral NAC administration (consequently GSH replenishment) with greater survival is consistent with the dramatically better survival of individuals with higher GSB levels (Fig. 3). However, although the data suggest that NAC ingestion may well contribute to improved survival, we emphasize that no conclusion can be drawn until NAC is administered in a properly controlled prospective clinical trial with survival as the primary endpoint.

DISCUSSION

Findings presented here link GSH deficiency to impaired survival of HIV-infected subjects and suggest a potential intervention to relieve this impairment. In essence, we have shown that GSH levels are lower in subjects with CD4 T cell counts below 200/μl (CD4 < 200) than in subjects at earlier stages of HIV disease; that among subjects with CD4 < 200, lower levels of GSB (a FACS measure of GSH in CD4 T cells) predict decreased survival; and that the probability of surviving 2–3 years increases dramatically as GSB level approach normal range. In addition, we have presented preliminary evidence suggesting that oral administration of NAC, which supplies the cysteine required to replenish GSH, may be associated with improved survival of subjects with very low GSH levels.

...

At a more immediate level, the demonstration here that prognosis worsens as GSH levels decrease suggests that certain precautions be taken to minimize GSH deficiency in HIV-infected individuals. In general, it may be prudent for these individuals to avoid excessive exposure to UV irradiation and unnecessary use of drugs that can deplete GSH—e.g., alcohol and prescription or over-the-counter formulations containing acetaminophen.

ABBREVIATIONS

GSH: glutathione

NAC: N-acetylcysteine

GSB: glutathione-S-bimane fluorescence in CD4 T cells

PBMC: peripheral blood mononuclear cells

FACS: fluorescence-activated cell sorter

ROC: receiver operating characteristic

NoTS: no trial subjects