Versions Compared

Old Version 25

changes.mady.by.user Alex

Saved on

compared with

New Version 26

changes.mady.by.user Alex

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Publish Year

...

Page Properties
idinfo

Author

  • -

Publisher

  • Alive & Well SF

Category

  • Controversy

Topic

  • AIDS Paradox

  • HIV Isolation Validity

  • HIV Test Accuracy

  • CD4 Reliability

  • Viral Load Reliability

  • Risk-Hypothesis

Article Type

  • Editorial article

Publish Year

  • -

Meta Description

  • The content questions the scientific basis of HIV, citing dubious original research and suggesting AIDS results from immune stress, not a single infectious agent.

Summary

  • This is a FAQ document that challenges the mainstream understanding of AIDS. It argues that the original science behind HIV was flawed and that lifestyle stressors and exposure to toxins play a significant role in the development of ill health. The document also discusses the difference between Type-I and Type-II T-helper cells and their importance in immune function. It suggests that rebalancing the immune system through proper nutrition is a more effective approach to treating AIDS than using toxic chemicals. The document also mentions the role of glutathione deficiency and the link between AIDS and poppers. It briefly explains the concept of endosymbiosis, which suggests that cells are the result of the merging of multiple organisms.

Meta Tag

  • Frequently Asked Questions

  • Questioning AIDS

  • Dr. Heinrich Kremer

  • Endosymbiosis

  • Respiratory Problems

  • HIV

  • Immunology

  • Lifestyle Stressors

  • Toxins

  • Germs

  • Th1 and Th2 Lymphocytes

  • Cellular Unit

Featured Image

Featured Image Alt Tag

  • Keyword of the image

...

Author

...

  • -

...

Publisher

...

  • Alive & Well SF

...

Category

...

  • Controversy

...

Topic

...

  • AIDS Paradox

  • HIV Isolation Validity

  • HIV Test Accuracy

  • CD4 Reliability

  • Viral Load Reliability

  • Risk-Hypothesis

...

Article Type

...

  • Editorial article

Page Properties
idinfo

Author

  • -

Publisher

  • Alive & Well SF

Category

  • Controversy

Topic

  • AIDS Paradox

  • HIV Isolation Validity

  • HIV Test Accuracy

  • CD4 Reliability

  • Viral Load Reliability

  • Risk-Hypothesis

Article Type

  • Editorial article

Publish Year

  • -

Page Properties
idmeta

Meta Description

  • The content questions the scientific basis of HIV, citing dubious original research and suggesting AIDS results from immune stress, not a single infectious agent.

Summary

  • This is a FAQ document that challenges the mainstream understanding of AIDS. It argues that the original science behind HIV was flawed and that lifestyle stressors and exposure to toxins play a significant role in the development of ill health. The document also discusses the difference between Type-I and Type-II T-helper cells and their importance in immune function. It suggests that rebalancing the immune system through proper nutrition is a more effective approach to treating AIDS than using toxic chemicals. The document also mentions the role of glutathione deficiency and the link between AIDS and poppers. It briefly explains the concept of endosymbiosis, which suggests that cells are the result of the merging of multiple organisms.

Meta Tag

  • Frequently Asked Questions

  • Questioning AIDS

  • Dr. Heinrich Kremer

  • Endosymbiosis

  • Respiratory Problems

  • HIV

  • Immunology

  • Lifestyle Stressors

  • Toxins

  • Germs

  • Th1 and Th2 Lymphocytes

  • Cellular Unit

Featured Image

Featured Image Alt Tag

  • Keyword of the image

Original Publication
By Alive & Well SF

...