Walter W. Stewart and Ned Feder saved the "Dingell Staff Report" from the memory hole. Walter Stewart's website archives of scientific misconduct disappeared off the internet in mid-1999 and have not resurfaced. Here you will find the monumental document along with many others related to the Gallo Case.
INVESTIGATION OF THE INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSE TO THE HIV BLOOD TEST PATENT DISPUTE AND RELATED MATTERS
Staff Report Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Committee on Energy and Commerce U.S. House of RepresentativesFulltext - Investigation
...
...
Commentary
Re: THE DINGELL SUBCOMMITTEE STAFF REPORTLetter by Serge Lang∙The Dingbell Subcommittee Staff Report
A letter from Serge Lang, 23 January 1995
Commentary - Extract - Institutional Response to the Blood Test Patent Dispute and Related Matters
Selection by Serge Lang
Commentary - The GALLO Gallo Case
from Challenges by Serge Lang
This 240-page article reviews the investigations of Robert Gallo's alleged misconduct highlighting many of the most significant revelations from the various reports.
Correspondence - Documents in the GALLO Case https://studyclub.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/QA/pages/17564615
Here is what the former Chairman of the Subcommittee, John Dingell, had to say to Harold Varmus, Director of the NIH, about the report, along with other letters.
Related Documents
Commentary - Response to the Charge to the Consultation Consultants to the Director of the National Institutes of Health Concerning the Investigation investigation of DRS. GALLO Gallo and POPOVICPopovic
January 29 and 30, 1992
Articles in the Press
...
In Gallo case, truth termed a casualty
By John Crewdson
Chicago Tribune 1 January 1995.
Pursuit Of of Truth Was was Not An an NIH Objective In in Gallo Case, Dingell Staff Report Says
The Cancer Letter 6 January 1995.
Feder, Stewart Rapped for Letter on NIH Stationery
Science & Government Report 1 March 1995
In a sparkling display of asininity, the National Institutes of Health has issued an "Official Reprimand" to its long-troublesome duo, Ned Feder and Walter Stewart, accusing them of violating a 1993 order to refrain from pursuing scientific misconduct. Their offense: writing a letter on NIH stationery.
With New Virology Institute, Gallo May Make A Fresh Start In Baltimore
The Scientist, Vol:9, #15, pg.3 , July 24, 1995
With a powerful group of local backers to ease the transition, controversial virologist Robert Gallo hopes for a fresh start, both personally and scientifically, when his Institute of Human Virology opens its doors this fall. The new institute, intended to advance the fight against AIDS and other diseases, will be affiliated with the University of Maryland at Baltimore. And it appears that his fellow scientists -- with a few sharp exceptions -- are ready to let accusations of scientific misconduct that have marked the last decade of his 30-year career at the National Institutes of Health fade. Indeed, many support him and wish him success in his endeavor.
...