Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Staff Report Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Committee on Energy and Commerce U.S. House of Representatives

Commentary

Re: THE DINGELL SUBCOMMITTEE STAFF REPORT

A letter from Serge Lang, 23 January 1995

Extract - INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSE TO THE HIV BLOOD TEST PATENT DISPUTE AND RELATED MATTERS

Selection by Serge Lang

THE GALLO CASE

from Challenges by Serge Lang
This 240 page article reviews the investigations of Robert Gallo's alleged misconduct highlighting many of the most significant revelations from the various reports.

Correspondence - DOCUMENTS IN THE GALLO CASE

Here is what the former Chairman of the Subcommittee, John Dingell, had to say to Harold Varmus, Director of the NIH, about the report, along with other letters.

Related Documents

RESPONSE TO THE CHARGE TO THE CONSULTANTS TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CONCERNING THE INVESTIGATION OF DRS. GALLO AND POPOVIC

January 29 and 30, 1992

Articles in the Press

In Gallo case, truth termed a casualty

By John Crewdson

Chicago Tribune 1 January 1995.

Pursuit Of Truth Was Not An NIH Objective In Gallo Case, Dingell Staff Report Says

The Cancer Letter 6 January 1995.

Feder, Stewart Rapped for Letter on NIH Stationery

Science & Government Report 1 March 1995

In a sparkling display of asininity, the National Institutes of Health has issued an "Official Reprimand" to its long-troublesome duo, Ned Feder and Walter Stewart, accusing them of violating a 1993 order to refrain from pursuing scientific misconduct. Their offense: writing a letter on NIH stationery.

https://aidsstudy.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/CH/pages/17695532/With+New+Virology+Institute+Gallo+May+Make+A+Fresh+Start+In+Baltimore

The Scientist, Vol:9, #15, pg.3 , July 24, 1995

With a powerful group of local backers to ease the transition, controversial virologist Robert Gallo hopes for a fresh start, both personally and scientifically, when his Institute of Human Virology opens its doors this fall. The new institute, intended to advance the fight against AIDS and other diseases, will be affiliated with the University of Maryland at Baltimore. And it appears that his fellow scientists -- with a few sharp exceptions -- are ready to let accusations of scientific misconduct that have marked the last decade of his 30-year career at the National Institutes of Health fade. Indeed, many support him and wish him success in his endeavor.

Additional Readings on Conduct in Science